Review: A Game of Thrones (PC)

5 mins read

Game of Thrones is a title I was really looking forward to because I am a fan of the books and television show, but then the initial reviews came out and most of them were middling – some downright hard on the game. I think what you will get out of this game depends greatly on your expectations going into it. While playing Game of Thrones, I realized that in a way, I was participating in two very different experiences.

The first is the story, which takes place in George R.R. Martin’s amazing fantasy world. It does not rehash events from the show or books, but instead tells a new story that runs in parallel to other events. Much like the books, this game is told through a couple of different perspectives. To that end both characters are quite interesting, with the rigid Mors Westford a very different personality from Alester Sarwyck who is making decisions with the fate of others weighing on his mind.

The story is fascinating, and there were some excellent twists and turns – especially over the game’s final chapters. There are multiple endings you can see based on the events and choices you make during the final chapter or two, but even before the story concludes you can see the effects of many of your dialog choices rippling through the storyline. The most obvious example of this might be that a character is around or not around to interact with later, depending on what you choose to do – or they may be around and choose to interact with you in different ways.

The narrative succeeds on many levels.

However, there is the other part of Game of Thrones, and that is the game itself. It almost feels like it stands apart from the storyline, like you have to navigate through the streets and combat to reach the story pieces you are looking forward to. Here the title is not as strong for several reasons. On a technical level, the graphics are poor. There is not a lot of detail, movement is often jerky and the performance in general was just not what I would have hoped for. The sound is a mixed bag, with some decent sound effects and a handful of excellent music scores (including the television introduction’s song). However, while the game has full voice acting, none of it is great.

There is a fairly customizable class and leveling process for each of your protagonists, though the actual combat is somewhat rough. I suspect it would have played better with a console controller, but I reviewed the Steam version and the keyboard and mouse interface was a pretty sloppy experience, no matter how much I tried to tweak the settings. The game also never recognized my controller, despite the fact it has a toggle for Microsoft and general controller that has worked with pretty much every other game I have played, including finicky ones like Skyrim. The combat itself has an interesting gimmick in that you can slow down time to make your choices. It is more tactical than just playing at full speed, but the skill choices you make are seldom terribly interesting – I found myself not having to use anything but basic attacks except in extreme situations where I was dramatically outnumber or fighting a boss opponent.

So in a sense, the game has two scores and it is up to you to decide what has greater value. The storyline was thoroughly enjoyable to me and I liked how my choices often had repercussions down the road. The gaming portion however, struggles badly. Sloppy controls, poor visuals, mediocre audio and boring combat make the game itself a one out of five with some redeeming value to be had in character customization and the Matrix-like slowdown of combat. Still, these things are nowhere near enough to compensate for the overall shortcomings in gameplay.

For me the good of the narrative outweighed the bad of the game, but I can see where some people will find the shortcomings in the gameplay and decide that Game of Thrones is not for them. It is a shame really, because this RPG should have been far better than this.

– Nick H

Our Scoring and Comments Policy

This is the bio under which all legacy articles are published (as in the 12,000-odd, before we moved to the new Website and platform). This is not a member of the DDNet Team. Please see the article's text for byline attribution.

  • Where are all these GoT games coming from? It feels like there's no dev time on any of them and they're all terrible. The RTS was bad, the RPG isn't great, and now that MMO is on the way too. Not a lot of hope for that one…

  • It's because a small company called Cyanide bought the rights to the Game of Thrones license before the TV series hit and the franchise became super-valuable.

    Cynaide strikes me as a team with great ambitions, but limited resources. Every one of its games (it was also behind Confrontation) is an idea I love, but I don't think the team has the resources to deliver on these ideas.

  • Honestly, I think you hit it right on the head, Matt. They have some great ideas and I do believe they genuinely want to do well by their games, but I think a lack of resources greatly limits the scope of what they can deliver.

  • I had a hard time getting into the G.O.T. game on the ps3 and ended up sitting on my shelf until i traded it to a friend after i played it the first two times for a total of maybe three hours, I hope the one that is being made now is much better and the fighting is smoother and the graphics and story are just all around better

  • The fighting wheel system is tough getting into, it slows down battle but doesnt stop it when deciding your attack etc. and this was not as smooth as i feel it could have been. the animations were at times pretty good but then it seems like they may have ran out of time on some textures and just left them. also the voice work leaves a bit to be desired, If i kept the game im sure i would have eventually made my way through it but i was just dissapointed in what i spent on what i got. for 30.oo this game would be great. For this reason exactly I really think that some game devs and pubs should really consider releasing a game at a different price than the normal 60. because im sure people would react differently when reviewing and playing, they wouldnt be so dissapointed they spent so much on a game that isnt worth that full amount..

  • Previous Story

    The weekend discussion: “Do you buy DLC? And if so, what?”

    Next Story

    Review: Magic the Gathering: Duels of the Planeswalkers 2013 (PC)

    Latest Articles