Lollipop Chainsaw and anti-sexism: why Juliet Starling is so important

8 mins read

Now that Lollipop Chainsaw has been available for a while, there’s been a lot written about the game. One of the more regular comments I see made about the game is that it is “sexist.” This confuses me greatly because my reading of Lollipop Chainsaw is the exact opposite – this game is one giant criticism of the sexual politics found in games.

Of course, it terms of the marketing is was exploitative right down the line to appeal the adolescent boys – Warner Bros needed a return on investment after all, and cheerleaders and upskirts are an easy sell. But forget the marketing for a second, and look at the game itself – Lollipop Chainsaw, from start to finish, is not only turning the expectation that Juliet would be an airheaded piece of eye candy on the head; it’s actually laughing at the very audience it was marketed to.

Starting with the character herself; on the surface Juliet is indeed something straight from a 70s or 80s cheerleader film, but that’s merely a ruse; with surprising subtlety the game’s writer, James Gunn, reveals an intelligent, articulate and empowered character in Juliet Sterling. So for instance; early on in the game (early enough that any critic who actually played it before reviewing it should have noticed), Juliet asks Nick – the body-less head that she carries around with her – if he knows Japanese. He does not, but she does. There are plenty more examples of this interplay throughout the game where Juliet demonstrates a greater intelligence than Nick, and, of course, at a very basic level she is the one that understands how to combat the zombie threat.

That wink… Juliet knows. And she finds you amusing

Physically, Juliet is also greatly superior to the men around her. Nick is bodyless and incapable of even the most basic actions without being led by Juliet. Though his head can be placed on a zombie’s body to grant him temporary mobility, he can only move at the direction (and condescending encouragement) of Juliet. Over the course of Juliet’s quest she is also responsible for rescuing classmates from zombies – both male and female – which presents her, physically, as the most superior being.

Similarly her sisters – not brothers – are also zombie-slayers, and really the only men in this game with genuine power are the zombie bosses. All of which are challenging, but not through physical means. Those bosses are great at using the environment to rain death on Juliet, but in a one-on-one fight, Juliet has the advantage.

What does all this paint a picture of? Juliet is both intellectually advanced and physically superior. It’s also telling that she typically ignores the crude behaviours of the men around her – Nick tells her to kill a zombie because he “looked up her skirt,” and she doesn’t respond. A rescued classmate tells her that he’s going to “masturbate to her tonight,” and she ignores him. Juliet is positioned as a character above such antics, and since every single male character is driven by lust, Juliet is positioned as a character aloof of the juvenile behaviour of men in general.

Clearly you’re meant to take the costumes seriously

Beyond the character of Juliet herself, the developer, Grasshopper Manufacture, takes every opportunity to laugh at – not with – any player that bought the game expecting an excess of T & A.

Take for instance the trophy system. There is a trophy for panning the camera down and looking up Juliet’s skirt. It’s the first trophy a player can pick up really, since it’s obtainable the moment the game starts. And yet, on a gaming forum I saw a comment from one player that it is one of the few trophies they haven’t earned. Why? Because it’s embarrassing. That’s precisely what Suda wanted to achieve – earning that trophy is not a reward. It’s mockery, since the player’s entire social network (and possibly their Facebook friends too, since the PSN can link in to Facebook to upload trophy data) will find out that they’re perverted enough to look up a digital skirt.

Much has also been said about the alternative costumes – and indeed those costumes can be very revealing indeed. But they’re also designed to be jarring. In other words, they are so over the top and so erotic that it’s impossible not to notice them. By drawing attention to them, Goichi Suda and the team at Grasshopper Manufacture are once again pointing out just how ridiculous the player’s behaviour is. It might titillate some, but behind the scenes, those developers are having a cynical laugh at their expense.

But perhaps the most telling bit of evidence here is a comparison between two very similar-themed games (on the surface). Lollipop Chainsaw features an empowered, witty female lead character. Onechanbara Bikini Zombie Slayers, a PS2 and Wii game, is the reality of what critics claim Lollipop Chainsaw is. Onechanbara is genuine sexploitation. There’s no context or characterisation – it’s literally girls in bikinis killing zombies. Anyone who can’t see the difference between the two games just is not looking closely enough. Context is everything.

And now for some real sexism…

So, none of what I’ve described above is that unusual for the kind of self-aware postmodernism that the game is explicitly designed around. Yet, because the marketing of the game was shameless, many critics seem to have missed this point: Lollipop Chainsaw is an expression of sheer frustration at the juvenile expectations of the games industry. It’s the most intelligent deconstruction I’ve seen of gender politics in the mass media – including films and literature – in years.

And for that, Juliet may just be the most important (albeit misunderstood) female video game character ever designed.

This is the bio under which all legacy articles are published (as in the 12,000-odd, before we moved to the new Website and platform). This is not a member of the DDNet Team. Please see the article's text for byline attribution.

  • is it weird that I think video game chicks are wicked I really hope game devs keep making games with tons of skin cuz it sure doesnt bother me. and to have a game like lollipop then have a real life girl play her thats just as hot is wicked cool. I was at Pax east boston when they made the real life Lollipop girl leave due to her lack of outfit

  • Hmmm… not convinced! I haven't played the game so I won't comment on the content itself, but the big danger of postmodernism is that it can get so far up its own bottom that it comes out the other side. At what point is LC it so ironically anti-sexist that it becomes sexist itself? It's a fine line to tread, and if the message that most people get is that it's packed with upskirt, isn't that (by definition) the message that's being conveyed?

  • It's a good question. One of the things the Internet has taught me, though, is that sarcasm and irony are tricky beasts when it comes to making sure the other people realise you are being sarcastic, and my understanding of LC is that its failing is not that it's sexist, but more that it was not quite able to get over the line with getting that message out there.

    Comparing this game to the similarly-themed but genuinely sexist Onechanbara really does highlight that LC has a very different message.

    But yeah, post-modernist art in general is a very difficult one.

  • The reason Lollipop Chainsaw has been deemed sexist is because those that accuse it of being sexist are, in fact, the ones who are sexist. They're judging Juliet based solely on her appearance as a busty blonde cheerleader, while ignoring her intelligence and athletic abilities.

    The same can be said for Lara Croft, who is intelligent, determined, witty, and independent. "But OMG she has a big chest, so she must be a dimwitted penis cushion!" *rolls eyes* Give me a f**king break…

  • Well said, dude. I'll need to edit your comment slightly because we have a strict "family friendly" policy with comments, but I do completely, 100% agree with you on this.

  • Previous Story

    The PSN update is Expendable

    Next Story


    Latest Articles