Review: Tom Clancy’s Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory HD (PSN)

5 mins read

This is better. After playing through Tom Clancy’s Splinter Cell HD, I was wondering how Ubisoft’s other two PS2 spy classics would work in HD. Chaos Theory has largely resolved those concerns.

From the outset, it is obvious that this is a far more mature production. The cut scenes have a strong eye for the dramatic without being as overblown as could be expected from a Tom Clancy production. It’s still macho and patriotic, to be sure, but this is more a Michael Bay that Uwe Boll kind of spy experience. This time around those cut scenes look far better too. While the facial movements and animation are nowhere near up to scratch with modern blockbusters, they do look decidedly less retro than you’d expect for a PS2 game.

Beyond the story, the level design is the real highlight in this package. To be blunt, Chaos Theory’s level design are the most interesting environments ever seen in a spy game. The third level into the game, where protagonist Sam Fisher is tasked with infiltrating a bank is still the highlight of the whole package, and effortlessly betters anything a Bond game (yes, even that brilliant Facility stage) has ever managed. But there are other highlights – crawling through beachside tunnels to end up assaulting a lighthouse is a brilliant way to kick the action off, and in true spy style, the exotic locations of Hokkaido and Seoul provide a fascinating backdrop for jumping from shadow to shadow.

Speaking of shadows, Chaos Theory has a far more naturalistic approach to light and darkness than the previous game. It’s such a critical element in these games, but in the original Splinter Cell, light was present when it made sense for a puzzle – it was a challenge to be overcome more than a device for humans to light the cold darkness. It was forced, and constantly remind the player that this is just a game. In Chaos Theory, lights are present where it would make sense in the real world, and the fact that creates a variety of challenges to overcome is simply a reflection of the incredible level design. Consequently Chaos Theory is a far more believable and therefore engaging experience.

Chaos Theory is a great looking game in HD too. Unlike the original game, the level of detail in the backgrounds and furniture is appropriate for the environment that Fisher is exploring. The various computers, crates and objects littering the environments are as you would expect to find, rather than simply existing when they form a “part” of the game. Indeed, sometimes there are objects in the levels that have nothing to do with the task at hand – a massive development indeed! Chaos Theory feels far more natural to play.

Otherwise, the game itself is much like its predecessor; with limited ammunition and by making close friends with the shadows, the goal is to guide Sam Fisher through some pretty linear experiences, though to the game’s credit it does often provide multiple approaches to a single objective sometimes. It’s frustrating to think on how much more these games could be if they opened themselves up just that little bit more, but at least in being linear this is a highly refined experience.

When Ubisoft ported a Splinter Cell game to the 3DS for Nintendo’s handheld launch, this game was chosen for a very good reason; it’s genius on just about every level. That port didn’t work so well, which is unfortunate, but Ubisoft has made good here. Sam Fisher’s second HD remake outing is intense, intelligent and complex. In the US you can only by the three games as one package right now. This game alone is worth that asking price.

Our Scoring Policy

This is the bio under which all legacy articles are published (as in the 12,000-odd, before we moved to the new Website and platform). This is not a member of the DDNet Team. Please see the article's text for byline attribution.

Previous Story

The Impossible Game is coming to PS3

Next Story

Review: Fighting Fantasy: Talisman of Death (PSN Mini)

Latest Articles